From chteufleur at kingpenguin.tk Mon Jul 11 20:16:41 2016 From: chteufleur at kingpenguin.tk (chteufleur) Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 20:16:41 +0200 Subject: =?utf-8?b?W1PDoFQgZGV2XQ==?= [en] Implementation XEP-0070 Message-ID: <5783E289.1050306@kingpenguin.tk> Plugin that implement XEP-0070. Geoffrey -------------- section suivante -------------- Une pièce jointe autre que texte a été nettoyée... Nom: commit_XEP-0070.diff Type: text/x-patch Taille: 6517 octets Desc: non disponible URL: From goffi at goffi.org Wed Jul 13 01:41:18 2016 From: goffi at goffi.org (Goffi) Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 01:41:18 +0200 Subject: =?utf-8?b?W1PDoFQgZGV2XQ==?= =?utf-8?b?U2FsdXQgw6AgVG9pIHYwLjYu?= =?utf-8?q?1?= Message-ID: <4269561.J9r2a01KTz@tazar2> english below Salut à Toi v0.6.1 vient de sortir, vous pouvez lire ce billet pour l'annonce des nouveautés : http://www.goffi.org/blog/goffi/08e8ea05-5d88-4a6f-a13b-eb6e548d65de en route pour la 0.7 désormais :) À bientôt L'équipe SàT -- Salut à Toi v0.6.1 has been released. There is no english announcement yet (should come in the next days hopefully), but you can check the changelog at https://repos.goffi.org/sat/file/3c92c0b977b5/CHANGELOG . See you soon The SàT team From goffi at goffi.org Wed Jul 13 11:17:28 2016 From: goffi at goffi.org (Goffi) Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 11:17:28 +0200 Subject: =?utf-8?b?W1PDoFQgZGV2XQ==?= =?utf-8?q?=5Ben=5D_Implementation_XE?= =?utf-8?q?P-0070?= In-Reply-To: <5783E289.1050306@kingpenguin.tk> References: <5783E289.1050306@kingpenguin.tk> Message-ID: <27706809.ODKLGqFPgS@tazar2> Le lundi 11 juillet 2016, 20:16:41 CEST chteufleur a écrit : > Plugin that implement XEP-0070. > > Geoffrey That looks great thanks ! I'll merge it in 0.7 quickly. Is there any test website to try it ? Answer me in private if the website should not be public. Looking forward to see the use of XEP-0070 spreading :) Thanks again Goffi From chteufleur at kingpenguin.tk Wed Jul 13 13:03:58 2016 From: chteufleur at kingpenguin.tk (Geoffrey) Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 13:03:58 +0200 Subject: =?utf-8?b?W1PDoFQgZGV2XQ==?= =?utf-8?q?=5Ben=5D_Implementation_XE?= =?utf-8?q?P-0070?= In-Reply-To: <27706809.ODKLGqFPgS@tazar2> References: <5783E289.1050306@kingpenguin.tk> <27706809.ODKLGqFPgS@tazar2> Message-ID: <7a7e766a-d129-5deb-2490-dd5ba8430aef@kingpenguin.tk> > That looks great thanks ! I'll merge it in 0.7 quickly. Is there any test > website to try it ? Answer me in private if the website should not be public. I don't know any website that using it for now. I will integrate it in my home automation central. But in order to test it, there are my server implementation at http://auth.xmpp.kingpenguin.tk (source code at https://git.kingpenguin.tk/chteufleur/HTTPAuthentificationOverXMPP to see how to use it). Geoffrey From goffi at goffi.org Sat Jul 16 16:40:45 2016 From: goffi at goffi.org (Goffi) Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2016 16:40:45 +0200 Subject: =?utf-8?b?W1PDoFQgZGV2XQ==?= =?utf-8?q?=5Ben=5D_Implementation_XE?= =?utf-8?q?P-0070?= In-Reply-To: <7a7e766a-d129-5deb-2490-dd5ba8430aef@kingpenguin.tk> References: <5783E289.1050306@kingpenguin.tk> <27706809.ODKLGqFPgS@tazar2> <7a7e766a-d129-5deb-2490-dd5ba8430aef@kingpenguin.tk> Message-ID: <10643703.oON8Mr7oce@tazar2> Hi Geoffrey You contribution is merged, thanks! Some suggestion/problem I have seen while testing: I couldn't try it with http://auth.xmpp.kingpenguin.tk and my jabber.fr account, for whatever reason it was not working. I've tried on my local server with your component. It's working well but I have some suggestions: - it's not clear what is the syntax used bu httpAuth.cfg. I've tried things like variable=value and it was working, but an example of config would be nice in the README - the default values don't seems to work. I had to explicitly set xmpp_server_port=5347, it's not working otherwise - it would be useful to have a extra error code for malformed syntax, and an other one for unreachable jid or server. For the SàT plugin: - the popup message is not really user-friendly: "HTTP () Authorization for (id: 12345method=POST).". A space is lacking between id and method, and it should be more explicit than the id need to be validated by user. I would use something like: "example.net needs to validate your identity, do you agree ? Validation code: 12345 Please check that this code is the same as on example.net " Thank again for your contribution, it's a really nice addition Goffi Le mercredi 13 juillet 2016, 13:03:58 CEST Geoffrey a écrit : > > That looks great thanks ! I'll merge it in 0.7 quickly. Is there any test > > website to try it ? Answer me in private if the website should not be > > public. > I don't know any website that using it for now. I will integrate it in > my home automation central. > But in order to test it, there are my server implementation at > http://auth.xmpp.kingpenguin.tk (source code at > https://git.kingpenguin.tk/chteufleur/HTTPAuthentificationOverXMPP to > see how to use it). > > Geoffrey > > _______________________________________________ > dev mailing list > dev at goffi.org > http://lists.goffi.org/listinfo/dev From goffi at goffi.org Sat Jul 16 23:51:50 2016 From: goffi at goffi.org (Goffi) Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2016 23:51:50 +0200 Subject: =?utf-8?b?W1PDoFQgZGV2XQ==?= =?utf-8?q?=5Ben=5D_Implementation_XE?= =?utf-8?q?P-0070?= In-Reply-To: <10643703.oON8Mr7oce@tazar2> References: <5783E289.1050306@kingpenguin.tk> <7a7e766a-d129-5deb-2490-dd5ba8430aef@kingpenguin.tk> <10643703.oON8Mr7oce@tazar2> Message-ID: <2223039.qbaAV6SAXT@tazar2> Le samedi 16 juillet 2016, 16:40:45 CEST Goffi a écrit : > Hi Geoffrey > > You contribution is merged, thanks! > > Some suggestion/problem I have seen while testing: > > I couldn't try it with http://auth.xmpp.kingpenguin.tk and my jabber.fr > account, for whatever reason it was not working. update: it is working with my libervia.org account. So it may be a S2S issue with jabber.fr From chteufleur at kingpenguin.tk Sun Jul 17 10:48:20 2016 From: chteufleur at kingpenguin.tk (chteufleur) Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2016 10:48:20 +0200 Subject: =?utf-8?b?W1PDoFQgZGV2XQ==?= =?utf-8?q?=5Ben=5D_Implementation_XE?= =?utf-8?q?P-0070?= In-Reply-To: <10643703.oON8Mr7oce@tazar2> References: <5783E289.1050306@kingpenguin.tk> <27706809.ODKLGqFPgS@tazar2> <7a7e766a-d129-5deb-2490-dd5ba8430aef@kingpenguin.tk> <10643703.oON8Mr7oce@tazar2> Message-ID: <578B4654.8010906@kingpenguin.tk> Hi > I couldn't try it with http://auth.xmpp.kingpenguin.tk and my jabber.fr > account, for whatever reason it was not working. I just check logs, and I get a "remote-server-not-found" error on jabber.fr JID. Will have to check why. > - it's not clear what is the syntax used bu httpAuth.cfg. I've tried things > like variable=value and it was working, but an example of config would be nice > in the README The example is in the httpAuth.cfg in the repos. Maybe it's not so clear. I will add a sentence in the README to explain that. > - the default values don't seems to work. I had to explicitly set > xmpp_server_port=5347, it's not working otherwise I just try, and it's working. Maybe you have to pull the repos, because at the beginning they were no default value… > - it would be useful to have a extra error code for malformed syntax, and an > other one for unreachable jid or server. Yes, great idea. I will add this. > For the SàT plugin: > > - the popup message is not really user-friendly: > > "HTTP () Authorization for (id: 12345method=POST).". > > A space is lacking between id and method, and it should be more explicit than > the id need to be validated by user. I would use something like: > > "example.net needs to validate your identity, do you agree ? > Validation code: 12345 > Please check that this code is the same as on example.net > > " The popup message should looks like "HTTP (POST) Authorization for example.net (id: 12345)". It think their is an issue here. But yes, you're right. I not the best when it's about being user-friendly… I will change the message. I also see that the message send by my component looks like this some times. I have to filter params en send error code if some mandatory params are missing. Thanks for your feedback. It's just what I needed for my component. Geoffrey From chteufleur at kingpenguin.tk Tue Jul 19 21:35:03 2016 From: chteufleur at kingpenguin.tk (chteufleur) Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 21:35:03 +0200 Subject: =?utf-8?b?W1PDoFQgZGV2XQ==?= =?utf-8?q?=5Ben=5D_Implementation_XE?= =?utf-8?q?P-0070?= In-Reply-To: <578B4654.8010906@kingpenguin.tk> References: <5783E289.1050306@kingpenguin.tk> <27706809.ODKLGqFPgS@tazar2> <7a7e766a-d129-5deb-2490-dd5ba8430aef@kingpenguin.tk> <10643703.oON8Mr7oce@tazar2> <578B4654.8010906@kingpenguin.tk> Message-ID: <578E80E7.8080009@kingpenguin.tk> Hi, >> For the SàT plugin: >> >> - the popup message is not really user-friendly: >> >> "HTTP () Authorization for (id: 12345method=POST).". >> >> A space is lacking between id and method, and it should be more >> explicit than >> the id need to be validated by user. I would use something like: >> >> "example.net needs to validate your identity, do you agree ? >> Validation code: 12345 >> Please check that this code is the same as on example.net >> >> " > The popup message should looks like "HTTP (POST) Authorization for > example.net (id: 12345)". > It think their is an issue here. > But yes, you're right. I not the best when it's about being > user-friendly… I will change the message. I change the message for something better. See you Geoffrey -------------- section suivante -------------- Une pièce jointe autre que texte a été nettoyée... Nom: commit_XEP-0070.diff Type: text/x-patch Taille: 1286 octets Desc: non disponible URL: From goffi at goffi.org Tue Jul 19 22:09:25 2016 From: goffi at goffi.org (Goffi) Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 22:09:25 +0200 Subject: =?utf-8?b?W1PDoFQgZGV2XQ==?= =?utf-8?q?=5Ben=5D_Implementation_XE?= =?utf-8?q?P-0070?= In-Reply-To: <578E80E7.8080009@kingpenguin.tk> References: <5783E289.1050306@kingpenguin.tk> <578B4654.8010906@kingpenguin.tk> <578E80E7.8080009@kingpenguin.tk> Message-ID: <2171275.bXfuQUCro2@tazar2> Le mardi 19 juillet 2016, 21:35:03 CEST chteufleur a écrit : > Hi, > > >> For the SàT plugin: > >> > >> - the popup message is not really user-friendly: > >> > >> "HTTP () Authorization for (id: 12345method=POST).". > >> > >> A space is lacking between id and method, and it should be more > >> explicit than > >> the id need to be validated by user. I would use something like: > >> > >> "example.net needs to validate your identity, do you agree ? > >> Validation code: 12345 > >> Please check that this code is the same as on example.net > >> > >> " > > > > The popup message should looks like "HTTP (POST) Authorization for > > example.net (id: 12345)". > > It think their is an issue here. > > But yes, you're right. I not the best when it's about being > > user-friendly… I will change the message. > > I change the message for something better. > > See you > Geoffrey merged, thanks From chteufleur at kingpenguin.tk Thu Jul 28 19:23:01 2016 From: chteufleur at kingpenguin.tk (chteufleur) Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 19:23:01 +0200 Subject: =?utf-8?b?W1PDoFQgZGV2XQ==?= Implementation XEP-0184 In-Reply-To: <5783E289.1050306@kingpenguin.tk> References: <5783E289.1050306@kingpenguin.tk> Message-ID: <579A3F75.5000303@kingpenguin.tk> Hi ! [en] Here is an implementation for XEP-0184 (Message Delivery Receipts). [fr] Voici une implémentation pour la XEP-0184 (Message Delivery Receipts). ++ Geoffrey -------------- section suivante -------------- Une pièce jointe autre que texte a été nettoyée... Nom: commit_XEP-0184.diff Type: text/x-patch Taille: 7797 octets Desc: non disponible URL: From goffi at goffi.org Fri Jul 29 10:39:31 2016 From: goffi at goffi.org (Goffi) Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2016 10:39:31 +0200 Subject: =?utf-8?b?W1PDoFQgZGV2XQ==?= =?utf-8?q?Implementation_XEP-0184?= In-Reply-To: <579A3F75.5000303@kingpenguin.tk> References: <5783E289.1050306@kingpenguin.tk> <579A3F75.5000303@kingpenguin.tk> Message-ID: <1549243.Qjb2gaFuYJ@tazar2> Le jeudi 28 juillet 2016, 19:23:01 CEST chteufleur a écrit : > Hi ! > > [en] > Here is an implementation for XEP-0184 (Message Delivery Receipts). > > [fr] > Voici une implémentation pour la XEP-0184 (Message Delivery Receipts). > > > ++ > Geoffrey Hello Geoffrey, thanks a lot, I'll review and merge it this week-end. ++ Goffi